A Theory on Becoming an Expert
Becoming an expert means deliberately building the mental architecture to judge, question, and understand what models generate.
Becoming an expert means deliberately building the mental architecture to judge, question, and understand what models generate.
Browser agents need explicit consequence models that predict how actions change state, enabling planning, credit assignment, and transferable learning.
Production agents need shared learning loops where failures become reusable experience across the network instead of one-off human patches.
Institutional knowledge becomes dynamic when every diff, decision, and correction is searchable, reviewable, and available at the moment of use.
Online evaluations turn production traces into verified frontier tasks with calibrated difficulty, while anchor sets keep progress comparable as agents improve.
Tiny Aya probes show how multilingual models route language into target-script, format, entity, and stopping behavior before decoding.
I adapted self-improving pretraining, interleaved-thought SFT, and RL mid-training to Qwen3-0.6B-Base.
Belief-revision experiments across Qwen and Gemma show that models can answer correctly while failing to update for the right reason, especially when source pressure conflicts with evidence.
On KernelBench, correctness-filtered surprisal selection found rare fast kernels, while ranking by surprisal before execution did not reduce evaluation cost.
Frontier security agents detect real threats but over-trigger containment, exposing a calibration gap between detection and restraint.
Verifier-based sampling can beat a narrow RL gain when deployment can afford multiple attempts, changing the cost-benefit case for multi-turn training.